CFL/Larry MacDougal
 
Fans invited to work O.T. on CFL's O.T.
January 28, 2010
 

Our League to Our Fans: LET’S WORK OVERTIME ON OUR OVERTIME
Canadian Football League Commissioner Cohon invites fans to give their input on possible rule changes with a particular focus on overtime

TORONTO – Canadian Football League (CFL) fans are being asked to propose rule changes this year with a particular emphasis on how to improve the game’s overtime format, says CFL Commissioner Mark Cohon.

“We had a tremendous response last year from fans when we asked for the very first time for their ideas on how to improve our rules,” Cohon said.

“So this year, we’re inviting their input on possible rules changes across the board, but we’re asking them to particularly focus on our overtime format.”

Under the current rules, if the score is tied at the end of a game, each team gets an opportunity to scrimmage from its opponent’s 35-yard line, until it makes a score or loses possession.

If the score remains tied, the procedure is repeated at the opposite end of the stadium.

If the score is still tied after each team has had two attempts, the game is declared a tie, if it’s a regular season game. If the game is a playoff or championship game, the same procedure continues until a winner is finally declared.

Some of the questions fans may want to grapple may include:

• Is the series-of-downs format superior to the old system of extra overtime periods or halves?
• Should teams scrimmage from somewhere other than the 35 yard line?
• Should teams be required to drive for a touchdown instead of settling for a field goal, or should teams be required to attempt a two-point convert following a touchdown?
• Does the overtime format really need changes, or is it already as good as it can be?

“Some of our most exciting games last season, including one of our playoff games, were decided in overtime, and that prompted some discussion among fans about our format,” Cohon said in a message to fans posted on the league’s website, CFL.ca, and team sites that form the CFL Network.

“We have tremendous respect for the knowledge of our fans, and their dedication to the tradition and future of our league, so we’d like to turn that informal overtime discussion into specific ideas that our league can consider as it looks towards the 2010 season.”

Fans are asked to send their proposals, including their overtime ideas, by visiting CFL.ca/rules or by emailing – rules@cfl.ca – by Monday, February 15th. Those proposals will be shared with the members of the league’s rules committee as it prepares to meet as part of the annual CFL Congress, this year in Edmonton on March 3rd, 4th and 5th.

“Our goal in consulting the fans, as in all of our rules discussions, is to make the great game of Canadian football even better,” said Tom Higgins, the CFL’s Director of Officiating.

“We are open to tweaks and changes that will improve the product and make the game even more exciting for fans, while respecting the integrity of the game, the history of the league, and the records and accomplishments of our greatest players and teams.”

The rules committee has the power to propose changes to the league’s Board of Governors.

“The framers of the league’s Constitution clearly wanted a fresh perspective each year, because it stipulates the rules committee cannot debate the same rule changes two years in a row,” Higgins said.

“In that same vein, we are saying to Canadians that we welcome their ideas on any rules topic, but this year we are particularly asking for their input on overtime, so we can add their insights and ideas to our own discussions.”

Cohon said last year fans’ suggestions included four proposals that became CFL rule changes:

1) Moving back the kickoff following a safety touch;
2) Giving coaches the green light to use "wildcat" formations that would move the quarterback around, instead of requiring him to stand behind or under centre;
3) Requiring a team that kicks a successful field goal to then kick off to its' opponents;
4) Awarding a team a third instant replay challenge if its' first two challenges are successful.

The fans’ suggestion that garnered the most attention was their push to have teams lose additional field position when they chose to surrender a safety when scrimmaging from deep in their own end, and the rules committee and the Board subsequently agreed to require teams to kick off from the 25 yard line following a safety instead of the 35 yard line.

“They wanted to encourage fewer safeties and so did we. In fact, 2009 saw a 14 per cent decrease in safeties,” Higgins said.

“Now, we’re looking for fans’ input when it comes to ensuring our overtime format is fair, exciting and, ideally, consistently produces a deserving winner.”

“We can’t predict the outcome of these deliberations, and it’s entirely possible that our fans and our football people will agree overtime doesn’t need an overhaul or even some tweaks. It’s also possible fans will propose other ideas that gain momentum,” Cohon said.

“What we now know from experience is that the process is certainly better with input from some of the most passionate, knowledgeable and dedicated people in the Canadian Football League: our fans.”

 
Fan Comments
Quinn
I don't think it should change. Starting from the 35 is just right. It is far enough to make scoring a TD challenging but close enough to encourage scoring or at least trying for a TD. As for what people are saying about the single, this is the CFL, a single point is part of the game and always should be. I don't see any point in changing something that is working.
January 29, 2010 - 6:22pm
 
DW
I think the overtime format is good the way it is other than starting at the 35yrd line. The starting point should be moved back so as teams are not starting off within field goal range.
January 29, 2010 - 5:58pm
 
Garrick
I Think each team should start from the 45 yard line. Also once each team has had to possesions and it is still a tie after a touchdown teams should be forced to go for a two point conversion.
- Maybe even have a kickoff for each possesion from about the 20 yard line or so to get special teams envolved.
January 29, 2010 - 5:31pm
 
Claude
Move the ball back or kick off. Don't get rid of the rouge, it is what makes our game different from the NFL. No sudden death.
January 29, 2010 - 5:31pm
 
Mike, Levelland Tx, USA
Good point Hutch! Let's not have a game end on a single, at best it's anti-climactic, but, as you said it rewards failure.
I'm used to sudden-death OT, BUT all too often it's the 1st team with possession that wins in that scenario.
How about a 10 or 15 min period: play it out & if we're still tied, do it again. Play 1 OT period in the regular season, til someone wins in the playoffs.
January 29, 2010 - 5:30pm
 
Andrew
I think it's good the way it is. Overtime is always really exciting. If there has to be a change, maybe make teams start at the 45 or the 50, but definitely keep the scrimmage style of play.
January 29, 2010 - 5:22pm
 
Randall
I like it the way it is now - BUT a better way might be a 10 minute overtime, coin toss for deciding kick/receive/end and then a new kick-off for the other team whether the offensive team scored or not. This way the whole field is used and it does not just become a 'kicker's game' to decide the outcome.If still tied both teams get a single point and in playoffs the teams would play until there is a winner at end of the first or second extra ten minute overtime quarters.
January 29, 2010 - 5:19pm
 
GG
Keep OT the same.
No single point on a missd FG.
Possible Fair Catch to get rid of all those penalties on the run back.
January 29, 2010 - 5:05pm
 
hutch
In order to be fair to both teams, overtime should be started on the 55 yard line. This means you actually have to move the ball to score any points. Starting at the 35 may give one team a wind advantage, which is unfair. As it stands now, a team can win a game on a missed field goal, which is rewarding failure.
January 29, 2010 - 4:51pm
 
Dino Verardo
Hi Mr.Cohon,have a coin toss to see who will recieve the ball.It will be one 10 min. half to be played and the team with most points would win.Example team A wins the toss and recieves the ball,and proceeds to drive the field but has to settle for a field goal. Then team B gets the ball on the kickoff and drives for the touchdown to win the game.The team that gets the ball second MUST get more than the first,if first gets a TD and extra point then team B must get a TD and TWO point convert to win.
January 29, 2010 - 4:35pm
 
« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
 
Prospect Central
Rank Name PosSchool
1 Ben Heenan
OL Saskatchewan
2 Tyrone Crawford
DE Boise State
3
Austin Pasztor
OL Virginia
4
Shamawd Chambers
WR Wilfrid Laurier
5
Kirby Fabien OL Calgary
6
Frédéric Plesius
LB Laval
7 Ameet Pall
DE Wofford
8
Bryce McCall
DB Saskatchewan
9 Simon Charbonneau-Campeau
WR Sherbrooke
10 Jason Medeiros
OL McMaster

Video

 
The Edmonton Eskimos signed free agent...
Posted: February 03, 2012
 
 
Making a catch is one thing, but it's what you...
Posted: February 01, 2012
 
 
The Hamilton Tiger-Cats signed running back...
Posted: January 31, 2012